+1

An Effective Teacher in Every Classroom

When it comes to education reform, it is often easy to focus on the tree, but miss the forest. This has been particularly true with No Child Left Behind, where many have lent a keen eye to a particular stumbling block, failing to see how it fits into the greater improvement.

No where is this more true than in NCLB’s Highly Qualified Teacher provisions. HQT has been a lightning rod for the past five years. The provision seems pretty simple. That the teachers leading our classrooms should have background in the subject or subjects they are teaching. Seems common sense, no, that students should be taught by educators who have documented knowledge in the subject matter?

Of course, many NCLB opponents saw this as an affront to the classroom teacher. It was an attack on the thousands of teachers gather the strength to pick up the chalk and stand in front of the classroom day after day.

While many of us are bursting with anticipation regarding the potential reauthorization of NCLB this year, a diverse group of policymakers have stepped forward to add a little strength to the HQT provisions. Their message — effectiveness.

Yesterday, Senators Lieberman (CT), Landrieu (LA), and Coleman (MN) unveiled the All Students Can Achieve Act of 2007. Imagine, an Independent, a Democrat, and a Republican all joining together to advocate for education reform and improvement. It’s enough to bring a tear to the eye of a cynic like Eduflack.

All hold my tongue on the introduction of another acronym (ASCA), but the messaging behind this announcement is brilliant in its simplicity. To borrow from Lieberman’s press release (thanks This Week in Education), the law is designed to “achieve student growth by focusing on what’s most important: achieving results in the classroom and ensuring effective teachers,” “encourage high standards throughout the country and better align the curriculum of schools across America,” and “focuses on closing the achievement gap by holding schools accountable for the performance of all students and providing resources to address this gap.”

Three noble goals. All achievable. All necessary to improve our nation’s public schools. And all common sense to the average taxpayer. Who is going to stand up and say we shouldn’t focus on achieving results in the classroom? Who’s opposed to high standards and aligned curriculum? And can anyone say that closing the achievement gap is a waste of our time?

Building off of the recommendations of Aspen’s NCLB Commission, this trio of senators are proposing legislation that will both strengthen NCLB as a whole and finally return the volleys from those critical of HQT. How? Instead of setting the bar at certification, teachers are now going to be measured on their effectiveness. What a novel concept.

Kudos to ASCA’s parents for offering up real ideas on how to improve NCLB. And a round of applause for those willing to acknowledge that the ultimate measure of ed reform effectiveness is improved student achievement, including Joel Klein and Michelle Rhee for lending their support to the initiative. Results matter. Kids don’t succeed in school and in life because of well-meaning intentions. They succeed because effective teachers taught them, assessed them, and ensured that they achieved.

Don’t believe me? Just try and find one good teacher who doesn’t measure themselves by the success of their students.


+1
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    mander1141

    about 1 year ago

    4 comments

    Where's the beef? Not a single shred of researched evidence backs up this article.

  • Prr_head_shot_max50

    eduflack

    about 1 year ago

    6 comments

    I don't think it is a matter of which is more important -- the teacher or the student test -- but rather that both are in place, both are measured effectively, and both are understood by decisionmakers. The ultimate measure of a teacher is how the students in his or her class perform (whether that be on a single test or through multiple measures).

  • Prr_head_shot_max50

    eduflack

    about 1 year ago

    6 comments

  • Img4234-small_max50

    EdwardBear

    about 1 year ago

    990 comments

    Interesting the article starts with teacher testing and ends with student testing. I wonder which one is more important?

  • Img_1011_max50

    Jill

    about 1 year ago

    744 comments

  • Jill

    about 1 year ago

    744 comments

Recent Activity

M052707_00_6600a_max30
Cindyx3 posted in: "Would you like to see where I work?", 21 minutes ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
Richardglendonlarson received the quiz result of "Excellent", 27 minutes ago.
Profile_pic_max30
jillsped77 posted: "HELP! Teaching more/less", 27 minutes ago.
Profile_pic_max30
jillsped77 posted in: "HELP! Teaching more/less", 27 minutes ago.
247b-1_max30
johnslat posted in: "The Conservative to Liberal shift...", about 1 hour ago.
247b-1_max30
johnslat posted in: "Did you vote?", about 1 hour ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
bhugh added a reference for "Melissa Rourke", about 2 hours ago.
Gamerkitty_max30
MagPro85 posted in: "The Conservative to Liberal shift...", about 2 hours ago.
247b-1_max30
johnslat posted in: "The Conservative to Liberal shift...", about 2 hours ago.
Gamerkitty_max30
MagPro85 posted in: "Did you vote?", about 2 hours ago.